Brisbane Men’s & Boys’ Hockey
Hockey - A Game for Life!
BHA Judiciary Outcomes - 2009
Brisbane Hockey Association Inc
PO Box 503
MORNINGSIDE Q 4170
Australia
Tel: +61 7 38994399
Fax: +61 7 3399 9825
Judiciary Outcomes
For some years BHA Judiciary Committee Hearing outcomes have been published on the BHA Website. It is thought that by doing so, players, officials and supporters can gain a better understanding of the consequences of unacceptable behaviour. Players' and officials' names and the names of the Clubs involved in each Hearing have been removed. The selection of outcomes listed here span several years. Click on a heading to read more . . .
These outcomes should also be read in conjuntion with the BHA By-laws, Part F - Judiciary Committee Rules (see links below).
Documents
Aust Sports Comm, Code of Behaviour (PDF)
BHA Inc By-laws, Part F - Judiciary Committee Rules (PDF)
BHA Inc By-laws, Part G - Appeals Committee Rules (PDF)
Definition
Often the Judiciary Panel will impose a sentence that concists of a number of weeks suspension and/or a number of weeks suspension 'suspended'. What this means for the Defendant is that any weeks of his suspension that have in turn been 'suspended' are held over as a form of 'good behaviour bond'. The Panel will specify a period for the 'suspended' part of any suspension.
Should the Defendant be called before the Judiciary Panel on a similar charge during the period specified, and is found guilty of the new charge, then the weeks held in suspension will automatically be imposed on the Defendant. The Defendant will then be liable for any additional supension imposed by the new Panel as a result of the guilty verdict.
| 09/9 Red Card - Fighting | |
|
A player from each team was given a Red Card resulting from being involved in the same incident . . . Player A suspended until after 4th fixture 2010; Player B found 'not guilty'.
Read More
|
|
| 09/8 Red Card - Dissent/Abuse | |
|
Player appeared before the Judiciary following a Red Card given for . . . 1 week suspension, plus 3 weeks suspended for 12 mths
Read More
|
|
| 09/7 - Striking Opponent with a Stick | |
|
After considering all evidence presented, the player was found guilty . . . 4 weeks suspension, in turn suspended to end 2010 Season
Read More
|
|
| 09/6 Red Card - Striking Opponent with Stick | |
|
Ordinarily striking an opponent with a stick would warrant a penalty in the range of four to six weeks . . . 2 weeks suspension.
Read More
|
|
| 09/5 Red Card - Abuse of an Umpire | |
|
The player made what he regarded as being a joke but which was misunderstood by . . . 2 weeks suspension, in turn suspended
Read More
|
|
| 09/4 - Striking Opponent with Stick | |
|
The player struck another player with a stick. The Panel found that it was a deliberate act . . . 4 weeks suspension.
Read More
|
|
| 09/3(b) Referral from Judiciary Panel - Striking Opponent with Stick | |
|
Following a recommendation to the BHA Board of Management by the Panel . . . 6 weeks suspension, with 2 of them suspended.
Read More
|
|
| 09/3(a) Red Card - R2 Striking an Opponent | |
|
A player was required to appear before a Judiciary Panel following an incident in a Veterans match . . . 2 week suspension.
Read More
|
|
| 09/2 Umpire Report - Verbal Abuse of an Umpire | |
|
A player was reported by a match Umpire for abuse of the other Umpire at the end of a BHL1 match . . . 2 weeks suspension.
Read More
|
|
| 08/2 Red Card - R3 Dissent/Abuse | |
|
The Panel dealt with a Junior Player who had been suspended by a Match Umpire for swearing . . . Suspended for 3 weeks.
Read More
|
|
| 1-10 of 11 | Previous Items >> |